References

Glogau RG, Kane MAC. Effect of injection techniques on the rate of local adverse events in patients implanted with nonanimal hyaluronic acid gel dermal fillers. Dermatol Surg. 2008; 34:S105-109 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34251.x

Goodman GJ, Roberts S, Callan P. Experience and management of intravascular injection with facial fillers: results of a multinational survey of experienced injectors. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016; 40:(4)549-555 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-016-0658-1

van Loghem JAJ, Humzah D, Kerscher M. Cannula versus sharp needle for placement of soft tissue fillers: an observational cadaver study. Aesthet Surg J. 2017; 38:(1)73-88 https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjw220

Niamtu J. Filler injection with micro-cannula instead of needles. Dermatol Surg. 2009; 35:(12)2005-2008 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01323.x

Pavicic T, Webb KL, Frank K Arterial wall penetration forces in needles versus cannulas. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 143:(3)504e-512e https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005321

Signorini M, Liew S, Sundaram H Global aesthetics consensus: avoidance and management of complications from hyaluronic acid fillers-evidence- and opinion-based review and consensus recommendations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016; 137:(6)961e-71e https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002184

Tansatit T, Apinuntrum P, Phetudom T. A dark side of the cannula injections: how arterial wall perforations and emboli occur. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017a; 41:(1)221-227 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-016-0725-7

Tansatit T, Apinuntrum P, Phetudom T. Cadaveric assessment of lip injections: locating the serious threats. Aesth Plast Surg. 2017b; 41:(2)430-440 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-016-0755-1

Wu K, Xie L, Wang M Comparison of the microstructures and properties of different microcannulas for hyaluronic acid injection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 142:(2)150e-159e https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004573

Using cannulas for dermal filler placement: why, when and how?

02 June 2019
Volume 8 · Issue 5

Abstract

Traditionally, dermal fillers have been administered to the face using a hypodermic needle. However, injecting using cannulas has become increasingly popular over the past decade, due to the changing goals of treatment, aims to improve patient experience and attemting to prevent complications. Many dermal filler products are now sold packaged with both a needle and a cannula in order to give the practitioner the choice of injection tool. It is therefore essential that the aesthetic practitioner is well educated on the topic of how to select the best injection tool for a procedure. This article aims to asses why we have seen an increase in the use of cannulas in administering this procedure, with the hope of helping the aesthetic practitioner to make the best decision regarding injection tools.

Soft tissue augmentation is a common, office-based procedure in which a filler is delivered into the dermis or subcutaneous tissue. The traditional delivery tool for this procedure used to be a hypodermic needle, most often supplied with the product. However, recent years have seen a major shift from using sharp needles for dermal filler injections to using blunt cannulas to deliver product in this procedure.

Similar cannulas have been used extensively for years in cosmetic surgery; predominantly for fat injections. However, these tools have been modified to make them suitable for use in dermal filler placement procedures (Niamtu, 2009). The increasing popularity of this new tool is related to a number of reasons, including:

Traditionally in this procedure, the typical injection technique included use of hypodermic needles to deliver the product sub- or intra-dermally by linear threading, fanning or bridging. Most of these techniques were relevant in the era in which dermal fillers were used as wrinkle ‘correctors’. However, in recent years, there has been a natural evolution to 3-D volumisation of the face, rather than simply filling the lines of the face. As such, the use of cannulas has increased in popularity, owing to the fact that this tool is suitable when filling a large area of the face in the subdermal or supra-periosteal plane. Regions such as tear troughs, midface, temples, forehead, cheeks and marionettes, require even ‘inflation’ by the filler, rather than the more focused approach to filling that is required to address individual rhytides.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Journal of Aesthetic Nurses and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for aesthetic nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month