References

Atkinson LZ, Cipriani A. How to carry out a literature search for a systematic review: a practical guide. BJPsych Advances. 2018; 24:(2)74-82 https://doi.org/10.1192/bja.2017.3

Carr WW, Jain N, Sublett JW. Immunogenicity of botulinum toxin formulations: Potential therapeutic implications. Adv Ther. 2021; 38:(10)5046-5064 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01882-9

Chidambaram AG, Josephson M. Clinical research study designs: the essentials. Pediatr Investig. 2019; 21;3:(4)245-252 https://doi.org/10.1002/ped4.12166

Dressler D. Five-year experience with incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin(®)): the first botulinum toxin drug free of complexing proteins. Eur J Neurol. 2012; 19:(3)385-9 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03559.x

Fischer T, Sattler G, Prager W, Rzany B, Pavicic T, Gauglitz G, Weissenberger P, Riaz S. Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Repeat-Dose Injections of IncobotulinumtoxinA in the Treatment of Upper Facial Lines: Results from a Prospective, Open-Label, Phase III Study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020; 19:(5)461-469

Grey J, Grove S. Burns and Grove's The Practice of Nursing Research, 9th edn. Philidelphia: Elsevier; 2020

Hefter H, Brauns R, Ürer B, Rosenthal D, Albrecht P. Effective long-term treatment with incobotulinumtoxin (Xeomin®) without neutralizing antibody induction: a monocentric, cross-sectional study. J Neurol. 2020; 267:(5)1340-1347 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09681-7

Kaur P, Stoltzfus J. Type I, II, and III statistical errors: A brief overview. International Journal of Academic Medicine. 2017; 3:(2)

Kerscher M, Fabi S, Fischer T, Gold M, Joseph J, Prager W, Rzany B, Yoelin S, Roll S, Klein G, Maas C. IncobotulinumtoxinA Demonstrates Safety and Prolonged Duration of Effect in a Dose-Ranging Study for Glabellar Lines. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020; 19:(10)985-991 https://doi.org/10.36849/JDD.2020.5454

Li Z, Filobbos G. What is the UK Public Searching for? A Correlation Analysis of Google Trends Search Terms and Cosmetic Surgery in the UK. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020; 44:(6)2312-2318 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01918-5

Moule P, Aveyard H, Goodman M. Nursing Research: An Introduction, 3rd edn. London: SAGE; 2017

Nassab R, Harris P. Cosmetic Surgery Growth and Correlations With Financial Indices: A Comparative Study of the United Kingdom and United States From 2002-2011. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2013; 33:(4)604-608 https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X13481972

Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine: Levels of Evidence. 2009;

Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing Research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice, 10th edn. New York: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2017

Rahman E, Banerjee PS, Asghar A, Gupta NK, Mosahebi A. Botulinum Toxin Type A Immunogenicity across Multiple Indications: An Overview Systematic Review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022; 149:(4)837-848 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000008904

Ratelle JT, Sawatsky AP, Beckman TJ. Quantitative Research Methods in Medical Education. Anesthesiology. 2019; 131:(1)23-35 https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002727

Sessler DI, Imrey PB. Clinical Research Methodology 1: Study Designs and Methodologic Sources of Error. Anesth Analg. 2015; 121:(4)1034-1042 https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000815

Sethi N, Singh S, DeBoulle K, Rahman E. A Review of Complications Due to the Use of Botulinum Toxin A for Cosmetic Indications. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021; 45:(3)1210-1220 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01983-w

Zargaran D, Zoller FE, Zargaran A, Mosahebi A. Complications of facial cosmetic botulinum toxin A injection: analysis of the UK Medicines & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency registry and literature review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022; 75:(1)392-401 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2021.05.074

Safety, tolerability and efficacy of incobotulinumtoxinA for the long-term treatment of upper facial lines

02 April 2023
Volume 12 · Issue 3

Abstract

Aesthetics procedures have increased in popularity over the last few years and have grown to be increasingly affordable to the general population. This literature review aims to explore the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of IncobotulintoxinA in the long-term treating facial lines in response to concerns regarding the effects of repeated treatments with the most currently used formulations in the market. Using the PubMed and CINAHL databases, a review of two prospective studies has been conducted. Results show that IncobotulintoxinA has less concentration of proteins in its formula, leading to less risk of developing neutralizing antibodies down the line with repeated injections. Methodological limitations of the two studies are also discussed.

Non-invasive cosmetic procedures have become increasingly popular in the UK in recent years, including procedures involving the neurotoxin, botulinum, a highly effective drug for the treatment of facial lines (Li and Filobbos, 2020). Between 2002 and 2011, the number of people having cosmetic surgery procedures increased by approximately 285% (Nassab and Harris, 2013; Li and Filobbos, 2020). Although the overall safety and efficacy of botulinum neurotoxin treatments is good, around one in five clients report being unsatisfied with the results of their treatment, or experience an adverse effect (Sethi et al, 2021; Zargaran et al, 2022). In aesthetic practice, lines in the upper face (glabellar lines) are commonly treated with repeat-dose injections, but there have been some concerns regarding the long-term effects of repeated treatments with the most used formulations (Carr et al, 2021) such as the gBoNT-A and BoNT-B. It is therefore important for clinicians to understand the safety and efficacy of these elective procedures when offering them in practice.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Journal of Aesthetic Nurses and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for aesthetic nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month