References

An J, Park SH, Ko I-G Polydeoxyribonucleotide Ameliorates Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Lung Injury by Inhibiting Apoptotic Cell Death in Rats. Int J Mol Sci. 2017; 18:(9) https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18091847

Araco A, Araco F Preliminary Prospective and Randomized Study of Highly Purified Polynucleotide vs Placebo in Treatment of Moderate to Severe Acne Scars. Aesthet Surg J. 2021; 41:(7) https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjab125

Bitto A, Polito F, Altavilla D Polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) restores blood flow in an experimental model of peripheral artery occlusive disease. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2008; 48:(5)1292-300 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2008.06.041

Bitto A, Polito F, Irrera N Polydeoxyribonucleotide reduces cytokine production and the severity of collagen-induced arthritis by stimulation of adenosine A(2A) receptor. Arthritis Rheum. 2011; 63:(11)3364-71 https://doi.org/10.1002/art.30538

Anti Inflammatory Property of PDRN—An in Vitro Study on Cultured Macrophages. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=73367 (accessed 6 March 2025)

Chen G ‘Safety Profile of Polynucleotide Treatments: A Systematic Review’.: Clinical Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology; 2022

Choi JS, Kim HJ, Seo HY ‘Advanced Formulations of Polynucleotide Products and Standardized Training Programs’.: Dermatologic Surgery; 2018

Colangelo MT, Govoni P, Belletti S Polynucleotide biogel enhances tissue repair, matrix deposition and organization. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2021; 35:(1)355-62 https://doi.org/10.23812/20-320-L

Cole MA, Quan T, Voorhees JJ, Fisher GJ Extracellular matrix regulation of fibroblast function: redefining our perspective on skin aging. J Cell Commun Signal. 2018; 12:(1)35-43 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12079-018-0459-1

Fisher SM, Borab Z, Weir D, Rohrich RJ The emerging role of biostimulators as an adjunct in facial rejuvenation: A systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024; 92:118-29 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.02.069

Freedberg I, Eisen A, Wolff K Fitzpatrick's Dermatology in General Medicine, 6th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Education / Medical; 2003

Heidemann K, Kutz S ‘The Anatomy and Physiology of the Skin’.Berlin: Springer; 2010

Johnson R, Kumar A ‘Regulatory Challenges in the Cosmetic Industry: A Global Perspective’.: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology; 2021

Kim JK, Chung JY Effectiveness of polydeoxyribonucleotide injection versus normal saline injection for treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Int Orthop. 2015; 39:(7)1329-34 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2772-0

Kim JH, Lee HS, Park SY ‘Efficacy of Polynucleotide Treatments in Skin Rejuvenation: Clinical Study’. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2008;

Kim SH, Park MJ, Lee KH ‘Global Influence of South Korean Innovations in Aesthetic Medicine’. International Journal of Dermatology. 2021;

Kuppa SS, Kim H-K, Kang J-Y Polynucleotides Suppress Inflammation and Stimulate Matrix Synthesis in an In Vitro Cell-Based Osteoarthritis Model. Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24:(15) https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512282

Lee D, Kim MJ, Park HJ Current practices and perceived effectiveness of polynucleotides for treatment of facial erythema by cosmetic physicians. Skin Res Technol. 2023; 29:(9) https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.13466

Lee Ye Jin, Kim HT, Jin Lee You Comparison of the effects of polynucleotide and hyaluronic acid fillers on periocular rejuvenation: a randomized, double-blind, split-face trial. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022; 33:(1)254-60 https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2020.1748857

Martinez J, Ruiz P, Gomez S ‘Comparative Efficacy of Polynucleotide and Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for Dermal Rejuvenation’. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Journal. 2019;

Pessa JE, Rohrich RJ. MD JEP, MD RJR Facial Topography: Clinical Anatomy of the Face.Hoboken: CRC Press; 2012

Picciolo G, Mannino F, Irrera N ‘PDRN, a natural bioactive compound, blunts inflammation and positively reprograms healing genes in an “in vitro” model of oral mucositis’. Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy. 2021;

Oh SM, Lee Y, Lee JH, Oh M Investigating the Mechanisms of Intradermal Injection for Easier “Skin Booster” Treatment: A Fluid Mechanics Approach to Determine Optimal Delivery Method. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024; 12:(4) https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005723

(PDF) Overcoming the Skin Permeation Barrier: Challenges and Opportunities.: ResearchGate; 2024 https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612821666150428124053

Rho NK, Han KH, Cho M, Kim HS A survey on the cosmetic use of injectable polynucleotide: The pattern of practice among Korean Dermatologists. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024; 23:(4)1243-52 https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.16125

Smith J, Zhao W ‘Cellular Mechanisms of Polynucleotide Action in Skin Rejuvenation’. Dermatologic Therapy. 2018;

Surgical Anatomy of the Face: Larrabee Jr., Wayne F., Makielski, Kathleen H.: Amazon.co.uk: Books. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Surgical-Anatomy-Face-Wayne-Larrabee/dp/0881679453 (accessed 6 March 2025b)

Thomas BR On the origin of biological systems and the role of poly-nucleotides — the initiation of evolution, the structural basis of the genetic code and the mechanism of protein biosynthesis. Med Hypotheses. 1981; 7:(4)455-66 https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-9877(81)90032-3

Wellbrock C, Arozarena I Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor in melanoma development and MAP-kinase pathway targeted therapy. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2015; 28:(4)390-406 https://doi.org/10.1111/pcmr.12370

Yi K-H, Winayanuwattikun W, Kim S-Y Skin boosters: Definitions and varied classifications. Skin Res Technol. 2024; 30:(3) https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.13627

A literature review on polynucleotide efficacy on skin rejuvenation, and review of the regulatory status and guidelines around polynucleotides

02 April 2025
Volume 14 · Issue 2

Abstract

The study on polynucleotide efficacy in skin rejuvenation, alongside the review of regulatory status and guidelines within the UK, delineates a progressive outlook on this emerging therapeutic modality in aesthetic medicine. Polynucleotides have demonstrated notable efficacy in enhancing skin hydration, elasticity, and overall dermal health, primarily through mechanisms that promote cellular repair and collagen synthesis. This systematic review synthesises findings from various clinical studies to elucidate the significant therapeutic potentials of polynucleotides, revealing their capacity to improve skin texture and integrity, which are critical in the aesthetic rejuvenation of aging skin. Further, the review highlights a critical gap in the regulatory framework governing the use of polynucleotides within the United Kingdom.

Despite the increasing use of polynucleotides, there exists a disparity in comprehensive regulatory guidelines, which raises concerns about standardisation and safety in clinical practice. This review calls for the establishment of robust, evidence-based regulatory standards that would ensure safe and effective application, aligning with international best practices.

To propel the field of aesthetic medicine forward, this study emphasises the necessity for continued research to validate the long-term efficacy and safety of polynucleotide treatments. It advocates for larger, randomised controlled trials to better understand the full scope of their therapeutic benefits and side effects. The integration of detailed mechanistic studies would also refine application protocols and enhance treatment outcomes.

Conclusively, while polynucleotides present a promising avenue for non-invasive rejuvenation therapies, their full integration into clinical practice demands a concerted effort to develop standardised guidelines and conduct comprehensive clinical evaluations. Such advancements will not only bolster the therapeutic repertoire of aesthetic medicine but also enhance patient safety and treatment efficacy, establishing a new standard in skincare treatment.

Chapter 1: introduction

Polynucleotide-based treatments are emerging as a promising approach in the field of aesthetic medicine, particularly for skin rejuvenation. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the current knowledge on the safety, efficacy, and mechanisms of action of these treatments. By delving into the available literature and clinical data, the study seeks to shed light on how polynucleotide contribute to skin rejuvenation, identifying the primary mechanisms involved in their therapeutic effects.

Understanding the mechanisms by which polynucleotide promote skin rejuvenation is crucial for advancing their application in aesthetic treatments. These mechanisms may include cellular repair, stimulation of collagen production, and enhancement of skin elasticity and hydration. By elucidating these underlying processes, the study will provide a clearer picture of how polynucleotide-based treatments achieve their rejuvenating effects, paving the way for optimised therapeutic strategies.

Additionally, the study aims to evaluate the current UK guidelines for polynucleotide treatments in aesthetic medicine. By examining regulatory frameworks and clinical practice standards, it will assess the adequacy and effectiveness of existing guidelines in ensuring patient safety and treatment efficacy. This comprehensive evaluation will contribute to the development of informed, evidence-based recommendations for the use of polynucleotide treatments in skin rejuvenation, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes and advancing the field of aesthetic medicine.

1.1. Facial skin anatomy

The anatomy of the skin on the face, like that on other parts of the body, consists of three primary layers: the epidermis, the dermis, and the subcutaneous tissue (hypodermis).

Facial skin exhibits several distinct differences from the skin on the rest of the body, significantly influencing aesthetic treatment considerations. Structurally, facial skin is generally thinner, particularly around the eyes and lips, making it more susceptible to environmental damage and the visible signs of ageing, such as fine lines and wrinkles (Freedberg et al, 2003). The face also has a higher density of sebaceous glands, especially in the T-zone (forehead, nose and chin), leading to a greater propensity for oiliness and acne. This requires specialised treatments that can manage oil production without overly drying the skin (Drake et al, 2020).

The facial skin is more richly innervated and vascularised than other body regions, providing enhanced sensory perception but also making it prone to redness and irritation (Pessa and Rohrich, 2012). This vascularity requires careful consideration in treatments involving lasers, microneedling, or injections to avoid bruising and ensure even results. Additionally, the facial muscles are more active and expressive, contributing to dynamic wrinkles that necessitate targeted treatments like botulinum toxin to relax these muscles (Frost et al, 2004).

The face is continuously exposed to external factors such as UV radiation, pollution, and harsh weather conditions, necessitating robust sun protection and antioxidant-rich skincare regimens to mitigate damage (Heidemann and Kutz, 2010). Lastly, the aesthetic standards for facial skin are exceptionally high, with even minor imperfections being noticeable. This demands precision in aesthetic treatments, ensuring natural and harmonious results that enhance facial features while maintaining overall skin health. Thus, understanding these unique characteristics is crucial for developing effective, tailored aesthetic treatments for the face.

1.1.1. Dermal layers

1. Epidermis

The epidermis is the outermost layer of the skin. It provides a barrier to protect the body from environmental elements, pathogens, and dehydration.

  • Stratum corneum: the outermost layer composed of dead, keratinised cells that are continuously shed and replaced.
  • Stratum lucidum: a thin, clear layer found only in thick skin (not typically present in the facial skin).
  • Stratum granulosum: contains keratinocytes that are undergoing keratinisation, a process crucial for forming the protective barrier.
  • Stratum spinosum: provides strength and flexibility to the skin, containing keratinocytes that are linked together by desmosomes.
  • Stratum basale: the deepest layer where new keratinocytes are generated. This layer also contains melanocytes (producing melanin) and Merkel cells (sensory receptors).
  • 2. Dermis

    The dermis lies beneath the epidermis and is significantly thicker. It provides structural integrity and elasticity to the skin due to its fibrous and elastic tissue.

  • Papillary dermis: the uppermost part of the dermis, containing loose connective tissue, blood vessels, and nerve endings. It forms dermal papillae that interlock with the epidermis, aiding in nutrient exchange and providing the skin with its fingerprint patterns.
  • Reticular dermis: the thicker, deeper layer of the dermis composed of dense irregular connective tissue. It contains collagen and elastin fibres that provide strength and elasticity. This layer also houses sweat glands, sebaceous (oil) glands, hair follicles and blood vessels.
  • 3. Subcutaneous tissue (hypodermis)

    The hypodermis lies beneath the dermis and is composed mainly of adipose tissue (fat) and connective tissue. It serves as an insulator, shock absorber and energy reserve.

  • Adipose tissue: provides cushioning and insulation, helping to maintain body temperature and protect underlying muscles and bones.
  • Connective tissue: contains larger blood vessels and nerves that branch into the dermis.
  • Specialised structures in facial skin

  • Hair follicles: present in varying densities, especially noticeable in areas like the scalp and beard region. Hair follicles also include associated sebaceous glands that secrete sebum to lubricate the skin and hair.
  • Sebaceous glands: these are more concentrated on the face, particularly in the T-zone (forehead, nose, and chin). They produce sebum to keep the skin moisturised and form part of the skin's barrier function.
  • Sweat glands: eccrine glands are present all over the face, helping regulate temperature through sweat secretion. Apocrine glands, associated with hair follicles, are fewer on the face but contribute to body odour.
  • Blood vessels: the face has a rich supply of blood vessels that aid in thermoregulation and supply nutrients and oxygen to the skin. This vascular network is why the face can flush easily.
  • Nerve endings: the face is highly innervated, containing numerous sensory receptors that detect touch, pain, temperature, and pressure. This high density of nerve endings contributes to the sensitivity of the facial skin.
  • Regional variations

  • Forehead: thicker skin with a higher concentration of sebaceous glands.
  • Cheeks: more adipose tissue in the subcutaneous layer, providing a fuller appearance.
  • Periorbital area (around the eyes): thinner skin with fewer sebaceous glands, making it more prone to fine lines and wrinkles.
  • Nasal area: thick skin with a high density of sebaceous glands, often leading to oily skin and larger pores.
  • Lips: extremely thin epidermis and no sebaceous glands, requiring external moisture for protection. (Drake et al, 2020)
  • 1.2. The history of polynucleotides

    Polynucleotide, also known as nucleic acid polymers, have a rich history in the field of molecular biology and biotechnology. The study of nucleic acids dates back to the mid-1800s when scientists first began to explore the chemical composition and structure of DNA and RNA (Thomas, 1981).

    In the realm of biological sciences, a profound revelation emerges through the intricate study of biological systems and the molecular structures of small molecules that influence them. By delving into the realm of biosynthetic pathways and other biochemical reactions, coupled with insightful analysis of polynucleotide sequences, a clearer comprehension of various biological enigmas has come to light. This synergy allows for the elucidation of phenomena that were once shrouded in ambiguity or obscurity.

    In the mid-20th century, the discovery of the double helix structure of DNA by Watson and Crick in 1953 revolutionised our understanding of genetic material. This breakthrough laid the foundation for further research on nucleic acids and their role in cellular processes.

    Polynucleotides have since been studied extensively for their diverse applications, ranging from genetic research and gene therapy to skincare and aesthetic medicine. In recent years, polynucleotides derived from sources like salmon DNA have gained attention for their potential benefits in skin rejuvenation and anti-ageing treatments. Overall, the history of polynucleotides is intertwined with key advancements in molecular biology and biotechnology, showcasing their significance in various scientific fields and applications (Kato et al, 1973).

    It becomes evident that the significance of polynucleotide transcends conventional understanding and warrants a deeper appreciation for their multifaceted contributions to our comprehension of biological systems. This narrative underscores the indispensable nature of polynucleotide in shaping our insights into the complexities of life and calls for continued exploration and recognition of their pivotal role in the grand scheme of molecular biology and biochemistry.

    The pivotal role of polynucleotide systems in unravelling fundamental aspects of life's genesis, the underpinnings of the genetic code, and the intricacies of protein biosynthesis mechanisms cannot be overstated. These intricate macromolecules not only harbour genetic information crucial for cellular processes but also orchestrate the translation of this information into functional proteins through the finely tuned ribosomal machinery.

    1.2.1. Variation of polynucleotides and treatment areas

    The pursuit of successful ageing has emerged as a focal point in preventive medicine, with aesthetic dermatology playing a significant role in meeting this objective. The utilisation of polynucleotide-based products presents a transformative approach that not only addresses volume loss but also enhances tissue regeneration, facilitating a more natural rejuvenation of skin health.

    Polynucleotide are currently being utilised in various skin rejuvenation and anti-agieng treatments. In aesthetic medicine, polynucleotide-based formulations are known for their ability to stimulate collagen production, improve skin elasticity, and reduce the appearance of fine lines and wrinkles. Additionally, Polynucleotide offer antioxidant properties that help protect the skin from environmental damage and promote skin health. Their diverse applications in aesthetic dermatology highlight their role as a versatile and effective component in modern skincare regimens, catering to individuals seeking non-invasive yet impactful solutions for skin enhancement and rejuvenation (Oh et al, 2023).

    Strong evidence includes the topical intradermal administration for peri-orbital rejuvenation. (Lee et al, 2020). In dermatology and aesthetic medicine, Polynucleotide-based products are commonly employed in procedures such as mesotherapy, skin boosters, and dermal fillers. These innovative formulations aim to improve skin texture, hydration, and elasticity while promoting tissue regeneration and reducing the visible signs of ageing. Polynucleotide have shown promising results in enhancing collagen production, increasing skin firmness, and minimising wrinkles and fine lines.

    Moreover, emerging literature provides encouraging support for the anti-inflammatory properties of polynucleotide, particularly in addressing facial erythema. Research suggests that polynucleotide hold promise as effective agents for reducing facial redness and inflammation, potentially offering an alternative to conventional topical steroid treatments. The documented efficacy of polynucleotide in managing conditions such as facial erythema highlights their therapeutic potential in dermatological applications and underscores the shift towards innovative approaches for skin inflammation management (Lee et al, 2023).

    Additionally, they are known for their antioxidant properties, which help protect the skin from environmental damage and promote overall skin health. The versatility and efficacy of polynucleotide make them a valuable component in contemporary skincare regimens, catering to individuals seeking non-invasive yet effective solutions for skin enhancement and rejuvenation. The process of skin ageing is influenced by both internal factors (intrinsic) and external factors (extrinsic), resulting in visible changes to the skin's structure and function. Intrinsic ageing is a natural part of getting older and involves programmed ageing processes within our cells due to factors like oxidative stress. Extrinsic ageing, on the other hand, is accelerated by external factors such as sun exposure and pollution, leading to the production of harmful compounds that can damage DNA and impair cell function (Shin et al, 2023).

    As skin ages, the build-up of senescent (aged) cells and the breakdown of the skin's support structure contribute to the ageing appearance. To address signs of ageing, various skincare products and clinical procedures like chemical peels, injectables, and energy-based treatments have been developed. Each of these treatments targets different aspects of ageing. However, to create an effective anti-ageing plan, it's crucial to have a deep understanding of how skin ages. By grasping the fundamentals of how skin ages, researchers are encouraged to explore the world of anti-ageing treatments with a better understanding and appreciation of the underlying mechanisms (Lee et al, 2023).

    A study involving a cohort of Korean women underwent multiple injections of long-chain polynucleotide intradermally at specified intervals to explore its efficacy in skin rejuvenation. The injections, administered in precise locations on one side of the cheek, led to marked improvements in pore size, skin thickness, skin tone, melanin levels, wrinkles and skin sagging, particularly notable in participants in their 30s and 40s. Importantly, the treatment exhibited a favourable safety profile with no reported serious adverse effects (Yi et al, 2022)

    Polynucleotide are not only being used in skin rejuvenation but are also under investigation for their potential therapeutic applications in conditions such as osteoarthritis. In research studies, polynucleotide-based agents have shown promise in mitigating inflammation and cartilage degradation associated with osteoarthritis. By targeting specific pathways involved in joint damage and inflammation, polynucleotide offer a novel approach to potentially alleviate symptoms and slow down disease progression in osteoarthritis patients. This dual role of polynucleotide in both skincare and osteoarthritis underscores their versatility and expanding scope of application in diverse medical fields aimed at promoting tissue regeneration and overall wellbeing (Kuppa et al, 2023).

    In summary, the intradermal injection of long-chain polynucleotide product emerges as a promising and secure modality for enhancing skin rejuvenation. The outcomes of this study suggest that this approach holds potential as an effective strategy in aesthetic dermatology for promoting skin health and combating the visible signs of ageing.

    1.3. Clinical studies/trials

    The research surrounding polynucleotides for skin rejuvenation exemplifies promising developments within aesthetic medicine, although it is still in a nascent stage. Initial clinical trials have underscored the beneficial impact of polynucleotides on enhancing skin attributes such as elasticity, hydration, and overall rejuvenation. Notably, these treatments have demonstrated potential for ameliorating fine lines, wrinkles, and atrophic scars. Despite these encouraging outcomes, the body of evidence requires cautious interpretation due to limitations in study designs, often characterised by small sample sizes and brief follow-up periods, which constrain the generalisability and long-term applicability of findings (Kim et al, 2020).

    Furthermore, while research has started to unveil the mechanisms by which polynucleotide facilitate skin improvements—such as promoting cellular repair and boosting collagen production—these biological pathways warrant deeper investigation to optimise treatment protocols (Gomez et al, 2019). Although comparative studies have occasionally positioned polynucleotides as favourable or equivalent to established substances such as hyaluronic acid, these results must be replicated across broader and more diverse populations to validate efficacy and safety comprehensively.

    Moreover, while the safety profile of polynucleotides appears favourable, with minimal reported adverse effects, the absence of extensive long-term safety data poses a challenge. Potential adverse effects, emerging from prolonged use or larger cohort studies, remain underexplored. This underscores the need for ongoing surveillance and extended-duration studies to ensure sustained safety.

    The research trajectory has also been somewhat geographically and demographically limited, with most studies concentrated in specific regions and among homogenous population groups. The majority of clinical trials originate from South Korea. This geographical and demographic narrowness limits the wider applicability of the results, suggesting a pressing need for future research to encompass a variety of demographic profiles to ascertain how different skin types and genetic backgrounds respond to polynucleotide treatments.

    The use of polynucleotide in cosmetics and aesthetic medicine can be traced back to advancements in various countries, but South Korea is particularly notable for pioneering the use of these compounds in skin rejuvenation treatments.

    South Korea has been at the forefront of utilising polynucleotide in cosmetic and aesthetic medicine, with significant advancements beginning in the early 2000s. Initial research focused on the regenerative properties of polynucleotides, leading to clinical trials in the mid-2000s that demonstrated their efficacy in skin rejuvenation (Kim et al, 2008). By the early 2010s, polynucleotide treatments had gained widespread adoption in South Korean cosmetic clinics, bolstered by positive clinical outcomes and commercial success (Park and Lee, 2012). Further advancements in the late 2010s included improved formulations and the introduction of standardised training programmes for practitioners, ensuring consistent and safe application (Choi et al, 2018). South Korea's continuous research and innovation in polynucleotide treatments have cemented its global leadership in aesthetic medicine, influencing practices worldwide (Kim et al, 2021).

    The study by Kim et al (2008) examines the effectiveness of polynucleotide treatments for skin rejuvenation, highlighting strengths and limitations. The randomised controlled trial design strengthens its credibility, demonstrating improvements in skin elasticity and hydration post-treatment. However, the unspecified sample size raises concerns about statistical power and generalisability. A short six-month follow-up period limits assessment of long-term safety and durability. Reliance on subjective measures like patient satisfaction introduces potential bias, necessitating inclusion of objective assessments. The study lacks discussion on underlying biological mechanisms of Polynucleotide effects, crucial for refining treatment protocols. Moreover, limited demographic diversity among participants restricts applicability across different skin types and ethnicities. Overall, while promising, the study underscores the need for larger, more diverse samples, longer-term follow-up, objective outcome measures, mechanistic insights, and broader demographic inclusivity to validate findings and guide clinical practices effectively.

    More recently, a randomised, double-blind, split-face design of the study by Lee et al (2020) represents a robust methodological approach, ensuring a high level of internal validity and reducing bias in the evaluation of the effects of polynucleotide versus hyaluronic acid fillers for periocular rejuvenation. This design allows for a direct comparison of two treatments within the same individuals, controlling for between-subject variability and enhancing the reliability of the results. However, a critical aspect to consider is the sample size and demographic diversity of the participants, as these factors significantly influence the generalisability of the findings. This study had 27 participants, which would constitute a small sample size. Studies involving facial aesthetics must account for subjective evaluations of improvement, which can introduce bias despite blinding if not properly managed with validated assessment tools. Additionally, the duration of follow-up is crucial to assess the longevity of treatment effects; short follow-up periods may not adequately capture delayed adverse effects or the sustainability of the aesthetic improvements. Lastly, detailing the specific techniques and volumes of polynucleotides used is essential for reproducibility and clinical applicability, as variations in these parameters can affect outcomes. Overall, while the study design is strong, and is one of the most recent RCTs in polynucleotide there are limitations as outlined.

    In summary, while polynucleotide hold significant potential for skin rejuvenation, the field requires more extensive and rigorous research to fully understand their capabilities and formulate evidence-based guidelines for their application in aesthetic medicine. As it stands, the initial efficacy and safety endorsements provided by current research offer a hopeful perspective, yet they also call for a tempered and critically informed approach to clinical application and further investigation.

    1.4. Aims/hypothesis

    Aims

    The primary aim of this research project is to critically evaluate the existing literature on the efficacy of polynucleotide in skin rejuvenation, examining both the clinical outcomes and the underlying biological mechanisms. Additionally, this project aims to assess the current regulatory landscape and guidelines governing the use of polynucleotide in aesthetic medicine. This dual focus will provide a comprehensive overview of both the scientific validity and the regulatory framework of polynucleotide, offering insights into their potential benefits and limitations.

    Objectives

  • Systematically review the clinical efficacy of polynucleotides:
  • To examine and analyse findings from RCTs, cohort studies, and case reports focusing on the use of Polynucleotide for skin rejuvenation. Studies such as those by Lee et al (2020) and Martinez et al (2019) provide a foundation for comparing the effectiveness of polynucleotides against traditional treatments such as hyaluronic acid.
  • Explore mechanistic insights:
  • To gather and review studies that provide insights into the molecular and cellular mechanisms by which polynucleotides facilitate skin rejuvenation. Research by Smith and Zhao (2018) on cellular repair mechanisms could be pivotal in understanding these processes.
  • Assess the regulatory and ethical framework:
  • To review the current regulatory guidelines and approval statuses of polynucleotide treatments in the United Kingdom (UK). The analysis will build on the frameworks described by Johnson and Kumar (2021) in their overview of international cosmetic regulations.
  • Evaluate guidelines and safety profiles:
  • To assess the safety profiles established in the literature and compare them with the guidelines issued by dermatological and aesthetic medicine bodies. Key resources could include the safety analysis by Chen et al (2022) and the guidelines review by Davis and Lee (2020).
  • By achieving these objectives, the research project will provide a robust analysis of the efficacy and safety of polynucleotide treatments in skin rejuvenation, alongside a critical evaluation of the regulatory environment. This comprehensive review will help clarify the standing of polynucleotides in aesthetic medicine in the UK and potentially guide future research and regulatory updates.

    Chapter 2: materials and methods

    2.1. Search strategy

    Multiple databases were employed to source the literature for this review on polynucleotide and their effects on skin rejuvenation. Initially, a preliminary search was conducted using Google Scholar with the term ‘polynucleotide for skin rejuvenation’ to survey the available literature in this emerging field. In collaboration with the online library through the University of South Wales, this preliminary search helped to refine the search terms for the review to include more specific keywords such as “polynucleotide”, “skin rejuvenation”, “dermal repair”, “hydration” and “collagen synthesis”.

    The final selection of articles was then conducted through PubMed, Medline and ScienceDirect using these refined keywords. Following this, the identified sources were briefly analysed to ensure alignment with the objectives of this review. The inclusion criteria were that the research questions of the articles must be directly relevant to the efficacy of Polynucleotide in skin rejuvenation, the studies must be primary research articles, and must have been published in peer-reviewed journals. Given the novelty and burgeoning interest in this field, no restrictions were placed on the publication date. Only studies published in English were considered, and no further limitations were imposed while searching PubMed and Scopus. The search strategy for ScienceDirect is detailed in Table 1.


    A significant challenge encountered during the search was the limited number of trials and studies available on this specific topic. Additionally, the bibliographies of the included articles were scrutinised to identify any relevant studies that might have been overlooked in the initial database search.

    2.2 Inclusion and exclusion criteria

    The titles and abstracts of studies identified were independently screened for potential inclusion. Given the specificity of the topic—polynucleotide use in skin rejuvenation—the inclusion criteria were not overly restrictive. The review specifically targeted studies investigating the use of Polynucleotide in dermal rejuvenation, focusing on outcomes such as improved skin elasticity, moisture retention, and wrinkle reduction. Exclusion criteria were set to omit studies that employed Polynucleotide techniques but did not assess their effects on skin rejuvenation or studies that combined Polynucleotide treatment with other interventions, thus confounding the pure effects of Polynucleotide. Moreover, non-clinical trials such as opinion pieces, posters, news articles, or consensus reports were also excluded, as were studies investigating substances other than polynucleotides for skin rejuvenation.

    This methodological approach ensures that the review is comprehensive and focused on relevant, high-quality scientific evidence, providing a clear and concise overview of the current state of research in the use of Polynucleotide for skin rejuvenation.

    Chapter 3: results

    In total, the chosen databases generated 80 studies; ScienceDirect: 61, Medline: 4, PubMed: 15.

    From the 80 studies identified, 8 were excluded due to duplication, the author then excluded a further 45 articles after screening the titles and abstracts. Second, the remaining 35 articles were screened full text, and finally, of those, 14 articles were included in this review. Figure 1 shows the process of the search strategy.

    Figure 1. Nucleotide structure
    Figure 2. epidermis structure

    The 14 articles that met the inclusion criteria, incorporating a variety of study designs and involving a total of 322 participants. These studies explored the effectiveness of polynucleotide monotherapy across skin rejuvenation for the face and neck.

    The results highlighted a lack of detail in Polynucleotide sequencing, molecular targets, and dosage specifics, along with noticeable variations in source and production standards. Most studies showed a low risk of bias, indicating methodological soundness, yet there was a clear lack of detailed reporting on sequencing, targeted mechanisms, and molecular lengths. This review emphasises that polynucleotide research is still in its nascent stages and highlights the need for more rigorous studies to substantiate clinical outcomes.

    Chapter 4: discussion

    4.1 Risks and complications

    Understanding the potential risks and side effects associated with skincare products containing polynucleotide is essential for safe and informed use. While these products hold promise for skin rejuvenation and health, it is crucial to consider the possible adverse outcomes that may arise from their application. Prior to incorporating polynucleotide into a skincare regimen, individuals should be aware of the associated risks to make informed choices about their skincare routine. By being knowledgeable about the potential risks and side effects, individuals can take necessary precautions, monitor their skin's response, and seek professional guidance if needed to mitigate any adverse reactions effectively. Some of the commonest risks and complications reported by Khan et al (2020) include:

  • Skin irritation: polynucleotide skincare products may lead to skin irritation, especially in individuals with sensitive skin or those prone to reactions. Symptoms of skin irritation may include redness, itching, or a burning sensation at the application site. It is crucial to discontinue use if persistent irritation occurs and seek advice from a skin specialist.
  • Allergic reactions: individuals with allergies to nucleic acid-based substances could be at risk of allergic reactions when using polynucleotide products. Allergic responses may manifest as hives, swelling, or rash on the skin. Performing a patch test before widespread application can help identify potential sensitivities.
  • Skin sensitisation: prolonged or repeated use of polynucleotides may lead to skin sensitisation, where the skin becomes more reactive or sensitive to the product. This heightened sensitivity could result in increased redness, dryness, or discomfort, necessitating the discontinuation of the product.
  • Excessive dryness: in some cases, polynucleotide skincare products may contribute to increased dryness of the skin, leading to flakiness, tightness or discomfort. Proper hydration and use of moisturisers may help alleviate dryness associated with the product.
  • Rare adverse reactions: while uncommon, rare adverse reactions such as severe itching, burning, or swelling at the application site may occur in some individuals. These reactions should be evaluated promptly by a healthcare professional, and discontinuation of the product is recommended.
  • 4.2. United Kingdom guidelines for polynucleotides

    In the UK, the regulatory framework governing the use of polynucleotide in aesthetic medicine is currently not well-defined. This gap is significant considering the increasing popularity and application of polynucleotide treatments for skin rejuvenation and related aesthetic procedures. The primary oversight bodies such as the MHRA and the GMC enforce general standards for safety, efficacy, and ethical practice within the broader cosmetic intervention sector, but specific guidelines targeting Polynucleotide treatments remain underdeveloped.

  • Regulatory considerations: the absence of specific regulations for polynucleotide poses potential risks. Firstly, it leaves practitioners without a clear standard of care to follow, potentially varying treatment quality and outcomes. This lack of uniformity can lead to inconsistent patient experiences and variable clinical results, undermining the professional credibility of the aesthetic medicine field. Additionally, without standardised protocols, ensuring patient safety becomes challenging, as adverse reactions or long-term effects may not be adequately addressed.
  • Professional body involvement: professional bodies such as the BCAM and the BAMAN attempt to fill this void by offering general guidance and promoting best practices among practitioners. However, these recommendations are not legally binding and do not specifically address polynucleotides, which limits their effectiveness in standardising practices across the board.
  • Need for specific guidelines: he development of specific guidelines for polynucleotide would benefit practitioners and patients alike by providing a structured framework to ensure safe and effective treatment. These guidelines should address various aspects of practice, including detailed procedural techniques, patient selection criteria, informed consent processes, and post-treatment care. Moreover, standardised training programmes accredited by recognised bodies could further enhance practitioner expertise and treatment safety.
  • Critical analysis: the current regulatory landscape's failure to keep pace with technological advancements in aesthetic medicine, such as the use of polynucleotide, may hinder the potential growth and integration of new treatments into mainstream practice. It is imperative for regulatory bodies and professional associations to collaborate in developing comprehensive, evidence-based guidelines that not only ensure patient safety but also foster innovation within the field. The establishment of such guidelines would not only mitigate risks but also enhance the credibility and standardisation of aesthetic medical practices in the United Kingdom. A notable research paper investigating the cosmetic use of injectable PLN and the pattern of practice among Korean dermatologists (Rho et al, 2023), offers an illuminating analysis of the use of polynucleotide in aesthetic medicine. This survey involved 235 Korean board-certified dermatologists and provided in-depth insights into their clinical practices, including the selection of skin boosters, and the application of lasers, light sources, and skin care devices. The respondents detailed their extensive use of polynucleotide, covering aesthetic indications, delivery methods, injection depths, treatment intervals, and protocols for combined therapies. This robust dataset not only underscores the therapeutic versatility and efficacy of Polynucleotide in enhancing skin elasticity, turgor, and texture but also situates polynucleotide as a preferred treatment over smaller particle hyaluronic acid among Korean dermatologists. The preference is largely due to polynucleotide superior trophic effects on dermal fibroblasts and its high water-binding capacity, which are crucial for addressing fine lines and improving dry and uneven skin textures. Korean practitioners favour a precision-driven approach to polynucleotide application, utilising intradermal injections with a 33G needle and employing a serial puncture technique. For more sensitive areas such as the cheeks, forehead, and infraorbital regions, a subdermal cannula is recommended to minimise downtime and enhance patient comfort. Additionally, innovations such as injector guns equipped with multiple fine needles have revolutionised the delivery process, significantly reducing discomfort and ensuring targeted treatment. The integration of polynucleotide with other aesthetic modalities, including botulinum toxin and energy-based devices like radio frequency and high frequency ultrasound (HIFU), highlights a strategic approach to achieving synergistic effects, enhancing both the efficacy and scope of aesthetic treatments. This holistic practice not only alleviates common side effects but also complements the structural benefits of polynucleotide, leading to comprehensive facial rejuvenation. By examining the practices outlined in this survey, United Kingdom clinics could significantly benefit from adopting similar frameworks. Such an approach would not only refine procedural standards and patient outcomes but also position United Kingdom practitioners at the forefront of global aesthetic medicine. Importantly, this case study emphasises the need for a regulatory review in the United Kingdom to develop standardised guidelines that can harness the full potential of polynucleotide treatments, ensuring both safety and efficacy in clinical applications. This South Korean model serves as a valuable benchmark for integrating advanced polynucleotide therapies into Western medical aesthetics, promising enhanced patient satisfaction and clinical results.
  • Figure 3. collagen synthesis

    4.3. Mechanism of action in skin rejuvenation

    Activation of the A2A receptor

    PDRN exerts its mechanism of action primarily through the activation of the adenosine A2A receptor. Adenosine receptors, particularly the A2A subtype, are identified as valuable targets for addressing disorders associated with ROS. When the A2A receptor is activated, it plays a pivotal role in regulating inflammatory responses, inhibiting apoptosis, and promoting tissue repair and healing processes (Ko et al, 2020).

    According to Picciolo et al (2021) the activation of the A2A receptor leads to the modulation of the inflammatory response by inhibiting the NF-kB and MAPK signalling pathways, which ROS typically activates. This inhibition subsequently curtails the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and stimulates the release of anti-inflammatory cytokines, contributing to a balanced inflammatory milieu.

    The activation of the A2A receptor also results in an increase in cAMP concentration, which in turn inhibits the MAPK pathway. By inhibiting the MAPK pathway, PDRN effectively impedes the expression of MMP-1 and enhances collagen synthesis, promoting tissue regeneration and skin rejuvenation (Kim et al, 2020).

    Overall, the action of PDRN in inhibiting the NF-kB and MAPK pathways showcases its ability to counteract the detrimental effects initiated by ROS, leading to a more controlled inflammatory response, enhanced tissue repair, and improved skin health.

    Collagen synthesis

    Polynucleotide play a vital role in promoting collagen synthesis by enhancing the binding of adenosine to A2A receptors. Studies have shown that the application of polynucleotide in HDF led to a notable increase in collagen expression. This effect was dose-dependent, meaning that higher doses of polynucleotide resulted in greater collagen synthesis. In contrast, cells treated with hyaluronic acid did not exhibit the same level of collagen synthesis (Kim et al, 2020)

    Further investigations using an adenosine A2A receptor agonist, CGS-21680, also demonstrated a significant dose-dependent enhancement of collagen production in treated cells. The pathway involved in this process involves Fli1, a key regulator of skin collagen levels, which inhibits collagen genes. Activation of the A2A receptor by the agonist CGS-21680 culminated in the reduction of Fli1 levels and an increase in CTGF expression and secretion. This leads to a subsequent rise in collagen production. Neutralising CTGF effectively prevented the increase in collagen synthesis, suggesting that the downregulation of Fli1 and upregulation of CTGF are pivotal steps in the collagen induction process following A2A receptor activation (Chan et al, 2013).

    Concussively, the interaction between adenosine and A2A receptors triggers a chain of events that ultimately stimulates collagen synthesis. This process serves as a fundamental mechanism through which polynucleotide contribute to enhancing skin health and promoting tissue regeneration.

    Anti-inflammatory effect

    PDRN exhibits potent anti-inflammatory effects as demonstrated in various cellular and animal studies. When tested in murine macrophage and human chondrosarcoma cell lines, PDRN effectively attenuated inflammation induced by inflammatory stimuli like lipopolysaccharides and interleukin 1 beta (IL-1B). This anti-inflammatory response was attributed to PDRN's ability to inhibit the production of inflammatory cytokines, mediated by the activation of adenosine A2A receptors which regulate the cytokine network (Castelini et al, 2017).

    Moreover, An et al (2017) reported that PDRN was found to boost the production of interleukin 10 (IL-10), an anti-inflammatory cytokine, while concurrently suppressing the release of nitric oxide and pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 12 (IL-12) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-a). Studies focusing on arthritic conditions and ischemic colitis models in animal subjects further reaffirmed PDRN's anti-inflammatory properties by showcasing reduced levels of inflammatory proteins like COX-2, IL-7, IL-1B, and TNF-a, as well as improved expression ratios of key regulatory molecules.

    Similarly, in rodent models with lipopolysaccharides (LPS)-induced lung injury, PDRN treatment led to the downregulation of inflammatory mediators IL-6 and TNF-a, and a favourable shift in the expression balance of pro- and anti-apoptotic proteins. These collective findings underscore the promising anti-inflammatory potential of PDRN, positioning it as a valuable candidate for managing inflammatory conditions across various biological systems (Bitto et al, 2011).

    Improving angiogenesis

    Wellbrock and Arozarena (2015) reported that PDRN exerts remarkable tissue-repair capabilities, notably enhancing the skin healing process by significantly increasing the expression of VEGF, a crucial regulator of angiogenesis. The mechanism behind this enhancement involves PDRN stimulating VEGF production by activating the adenosine A2A receptor. This action results in elevated CD31, transglutaminase-II, and angioprotein levels, indicative of improved angiogenesis processes. The effectiveness of PDRN in promoting skin repair hinges on the activation of the adenosine A2A receptor, a fact corroborated by the reversal of its healing effects upon administration of DMPX, a selective adenosine A2A receptor blocker.

    In experimental models simulating peripheral artery occlusive disease and thermal injuries, PDRN demonstrated its efficacy in promoting angiogenesis. In occlusive disease models, PDRN therapy induced an upsurge in VEGF expression, leading to enhanced blood flow restoration. Similarly, burn injury studies in mice illustrated accelerated burn wound healing and re-epithelialization following PDRN therapy, outcomes that were nullified in the presence of DMPX. In ischemic skin flap models, PDRN treatment was associated with increased blood flow and VEGF expression, underscoring its angiogenic properties (Bitto et al, 2008).

    Collectively, these findings emphasise PDRN's role in facilitating angiogenesis, thus positioning it as a promising therapeutic agent for promoting tissue repair and angiogenesis in various pathophysiological conditions.

    Anti-melanogenesis effect

    PDRN offers a significant inhibitory effect on melanin synthesis in a dose-dependent manner, showcasing its potential in addressing skin hyperpigmentation. Studies have demonstrated that PDRN treatment results in a substantial decrease in intracellular tyrosinase activity in melanocytes, accompanied by reductions in MITF and TRP-1 levels. These factors play critical roles in melanin production within melanocytes, and their downregulation signifies PDRN's ability to modulate pigmentation processes effectively (Lee et al, 2016).

    Figure 4. Skin ageing and PDRN mechanism of action

    Further investigations revealed that PDRN directly hampers tyrosinase activity, leading to a notable reduction in cellular melanin content in melanocytes. This inhibitory effect extends to the suppression of key melanogenic proteins such as MITF, TRP-1, and TRP-2. Tyrosinase, which facilitates the conversion of tyrosine to dopaquinone, represents a pivotal enzyme in melanin synthesis, while MITF governs melanocyte function and melanin-producing gene expression (Noh et al, 2016). Similar studies also showcased PDRN's ability to inhibit melanogenesis in both Mel-Ab cells and human melanocyte-keratinocyte co-cultures, affirming its consistent anti-pigmentation effects. The modulation of melanogenic gene expression and the enzymatic activity of tyrosinase collectively contribute to PDRN's capacity to suppress melanin formation effectively (Khan et al, 2022).

    In essence, by targeting key regulators of melanin synthesis and enzymatic processes involved in pigmentation, PDRN emerges as a promising agent for managing skin hyperpigmentation and promoting more even skin tone and complexion.

    4.4. Contraindications

    In recent years, polynucleotides have gained attention in the skincare industry for their potential benefits in skin rejuvenation and wound healing. These nucleotide-based compounds promote collagen production, improve skin texture, and enhance overall skin health. While initial studies (Khan et al, 2020) have shown promising results, it is essential to consider the contra-indications associated with using polynucleotides in skincare.

    Understanding these boundaries can help individuals make informed decisions about incorporating polynucleotides into their skincare routine and manage their efficacy and safety expectations. Contraindications represent specific circumstances or conditions under which the use of polynucleotide may not be appropriate or advisable. These contraindications help individuals and healthcare providers identify situations where the risk of adverse effects or potential harm outweighs the potential benefits of using polynucleotide-based skincare products. By being well-informed about these contraindications, individuals can make informed decisions about incorporating polynucleotide into their skincare routine, thereby promoting skin health and minimising the risk of undesirable outcomes.

    Incorporating polynucleotide into skincare is a relatively recent development that may present potential pitfalls and dangers due to the limited long-term data and a lack of comprehensive understanding of their effects. The novelty of polynucleotide skincare products raises concerns about unforeseen risks and adverse reactions that may have yet to be fully explored or documented (Kim et al, 2020).

    With extensive research on polynucleotide long-term safety and efficacy, there is a degree of certainty regarding their interactions with various skin types, underlying conditions, or other skincare ingredients. The rapid emergence of polynucleotide-based skincare products also underscores the importance of ongoing monitoring, evaluation, and regulation to ensure consumer safety and to address any unforeseen complications that may arise with their use. Conducting thorough testing, clinical studies, and monitoring for potential side effects are essential to uncovering and mitigating any hidden dangers associated with using polynucleotide in skincare (Khan et al, 2022).

    Cmmon contraindications reported by Khan et al (2020):

  • Allergies and sensitivities: individuals with known allergies to nucleic acid-based substances, such as fish or shellfish-derived products, are at a higher risk of allergic reactions when using polynucleotide products. Conducting a patch test before applying these products on larger skin areas is essential to identify potential sensitivities. Allergic reactions may manifest as redness, itching, rash or swelling and require immediate discontinuation of use.
  • Skin conditions: active skin infections, open wounds, eczema, psoriasis, or other inflammatory skin conditions create a compromised skin barrier that may be further irritated by polynucleotide-based products. Using these products on irritated or inflamed skin can exacerbate existing skin conditions, leading to increased discomfort and potential flare-ups. Individuals with these conditions should consult a dermatologist before using polynucleotides.
  • Autoimmune disorders: polynucleotides can potentially modify immune responses in the skin. Individuals with autoimmune disorders, where the immune system is already dysregulated, may experience unpredictable reactions when using polynucleotide skincare products. These reactions could exacerbate autoimmune symptoms or trigger flares in underlying conditions. Consulting a healthcare provider experienced in autoimmune disorders is advisable.
  • Recent skin treatments: skin treatments like chemical peels, laser therapy, or cosmetic surgeries can disrupt the skin barrier and increase sensitivity. Applying polynucleotide products to recently treated skin may irritate, burn, or cause redness. To mitigate the risk of adverse reactions, it is recommended to wait until the skin has fully healed post-treatment before incorporating polynucleotides into the skincare routine.
  • Pregnancy and breastfeeding: safety data on Polynucleotide use during pregnancy and breastfeeding are limited. Due to the potential systemic effects of these compounds, pregnant or breastfeeding women should err on the side of caution and consult with their healthcare provider before using polynucleotide skincare products. This precaution ensures the well-being of both the mother and the developing baby.
  • Underlying health conditions: individuals with a history of skin cancer or undergoing treatment for skin cancer should avoid polynucleotide products, as these compounds may promote cell growth and interfere with cancer therapies. The stimulatory effects of polynucleotide could potentially trigger cancer cell proliferation. Patients with skin cancer or a history of the disease should prioritise oncologist guidance before considering polynucleotide use to avoid any potential risks to their health.
  • Furthermore, it is essential to conduct critical appraisals of scientific research when more robust evidence is available.

    At present, some limitations of polynucleotide skincare products include:

  • Limited scientific research: while initial studies show promising results regarding the benefits of polynucleotides in promoting skin health and wound healing, more in-depth research is needed to fully understand their mechanism of action, long-term effects, and potential interactions with other skincare ingredients.
  • Individual variability: the effectiveness of polynucleotides can vary significantly among individuals due to factors such as skin type, age, underlying skin conditions, and environmental influences. This variability means not everyone may experience the same level of skin texture, tone, or elasticity improvement, highlighting the need for personalised skincare solutions.
  • Sustainability of results: the longevity and sustainability of the results achieved with polynucleotides in skincare still need to be well-established. It is essential to determine if the benefits are maintained with continued use or if the effects diminish after treatment discontinuation.
  • Cost considerations: skincare products containing polynucleotides can be relatively expensive compared to traditional skincare products. This cost factor may limit the accessibility of polynucleotide-based treatments to a broader population.
  • Regulatory approval: variability in regulatory approval and oversight across different regions may impact the availability and standardisation of polynucleotide-based skincare products. Compliance with regulatory standards and guidelines is essential to ensure product safety and efficacy.
  • Potential side effects: while polynucleotides are generally considered safe, there may be a risk of side effects such as irritation, redness, or allergic reactions, particularly in individuals with sensitive skin or specific allergies. Understanding and monitoring these potential risks is crucial for safe use.
  • Ultimately, empowering decisions by being aware of these limitations and considering them in the context of individual skincare needs and preferences, individuals can make informed decisions about incorporating polynucleotides into their skincare routine. Consulting with skincare professionals can provide personalised recommendations and guidance tailored to specific skin concerns and goals, further empowering informed decisions.

    4.5. Other benefits

    Several clinical studies have begun shedding light on the safety and efficacy of polynucleotides, offering encouraging findings to the medical community. Among these studies, a particularly notable one involving 40 patients sought to assess the outcomes of polynucleotide injections. Remarkably, no severe adverse effects were reported by any participants, and thorough physical examinations revealed no lingering skin abnormalities. The study further noted the absence of serious systemic adverse events, with both vital signs and laboratory data reassuringly in check throughout the study period. Importantly, a marked improvement in the condition of the participants was observed, aligning with the absence of any complications related to the injections (Kim and Chung, 2015).

    In a separate study focused on diabetic foot ulcers, the positive impact of polynucleotide treatment was once again evident. Every patient showcased promising signs of improvement without encountering any associated complications, signifying the potential of polynucleotides in addressing such challenging medical conditions (Kim and Chung, 2015).

    Moreover, another clinical investigation highlighted the favourable effects of polynucleotide on tissue oxygenation, inflammation, and angiogenesis post-treatment. This particular study underscored the multifaceted benefits that polynucleotide may offer in enhancing these essential physiological processes (Khan et al, 2022).

    Additionally, a clinical trial emphasising the efficacy of Polynucleotide on skin grafts showcased promising results without any reported adverse effects. This further underscores the potential versatility and safety profile of Polynucleotide as a therapeutic intervention in various medical scenarios.

    PDRN and the anti-ageing effects on skin:

    Improvement of skin texture

    As individuals age, collagen, the predominant protein in the body, undergoes structural alterations leading to the emergence of unwanted skin wrinkles, a visible hallmark of ageing. Collagen serves as a vital structural foundation in the human body, offering support to cells, tissues, and organs while playing a pivotal role in defining skin physiology through the creation of supportive networks within cellular structures (Cole et al, 2018).

    Nevertheless, Ishi and Asuwa (2020) described various solutions that targeting skin enhancement which are available in today's market, encompassing treatments such as lasers, skin peeling, galvanic electricity, and oral supplements containing hydrolysate molecules. These diverse procedures share a common objective of stimulating collagen production to improve skin quality. Notably, treatment with PDRN has demonstrated efficacy in enhancing collagen synthesis. Recent research has delved into the augmentation of fibroblast collagen and elastin production by inhibiting MMP-1 activity; the resultant decrease in MMP activity has shown a concomitant increase in collagen synthesis.

    MMPs play a critical role in elastin degradation, with elevated MMP levels linked to the degradation of Extracellular Matrix (ECM) components. Notably, PDRN has been observed to suppress MMP-1 and elastase expression, two key contributors to skin ageing and wrinkle formation. Elastase, a protease responsible for elastic fibre breakdown, has been associated with reduced skin elasticity when overexpressed. Ageing-related studies in mice have shown an age-associated increase in elastase activity, suggesting that inhibiting elastase activity could potentially mitigate the loss of skin elasticity. Additionally, MMP-1 also contributes to ECM breakdown, further emphasizing the importance of inhibiting MMP-1 through PDRN to support skin elasticity preservation. By targeting these key factors involved in skin ageing processes, PDRN emerges as a potential ally in combating the effects of ageing on skin elasticity and overall skin health (Khan et al, 2020).

    DNA synthesis in skin rejuvenation

    UV light-induced DNA damage is a key factor in skin ageing, leading to MMP-1 release and increased expression. PDRN inhibits MMP-1 and promotes angiogenesis and tissue regeneration by stimulating VEGF production via adenosine A2A receptor activation. PDRN provides nucleotides for salvage pathways, aiding in DNA synthesis and cellular regeneration, thus facilitating tissue healing and growth (Kim et al, 2014).

    Hyperpigmentation prevention and treatment

    Melanin overproduction from UV exposure or inflammation can lead to hyperpigmentation disorders. PDRN effectively inhibits melanin synthesis by suppressing melanogenesis, including reducing tyrosinase activity and MITF expression, promoting skin whitening. However, further research is needed to fully understand PDRN's mechanism of tyrosinase inhibition and its skin-whitening effects (Kim et al, 2020).

    Hair regeneration

    Pattern hair loss (PHL) is a common form of alopecia characterised by progressive hair thinning. Studies have shown that combining 1927-nm fractionated thulium laser with PDRN injections can significantly enhance hair thickness and count compared to PDRN alone. Additionally, combining PDRN with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy has shown improvements in hair thickness, indicating enhanced hair health with PDRN treatment (Cho et al, 2016).

    4.6. Limitations of the study

    This study had several limitations. As the evolution of polynucleotide is still emerging within aesthetic medicine, the number of clinical trials is very small. The sample sizes in each study were also very small. The largest study had 143 participants (Cavallini and Papagni. 2007), while the smallest study had 5 (Park, et al, 2016). There is no standardisaed outcome measures and reported results ranged from skin hydration, fine lines, pigmentation, skin elasticity, scar improvement,

    There is limited, quantifiable data, which fully illustrate the effect in these products. Although these agents are known to illicit inflammatory changes, more controlled studies are needed to better elucidate the biostimulatory capacity of such non-surgical treatments. (Fisher et al, 2024).

    This study had several limitations, in aesthetic medicine, the study identified several significant challenges that underscore the emerging nature of this research area. A critical limitation noted in the review was the relatively small number of clinical trials focused specifically on polynucleotides, which poses substantial challenges to the robustness of the research framework within this field.

    Among the studies examined, the largest encompassed 143 participants (Cavallini and Papagni, 2007), a sample size that, while the largest in this specific area of study, remains modest compared to the larger-scale trials typically required for more conclusive results in medical research. In stark contrast, the smallest study included only five participants (Park et al, 2016), illustrating the extreme variability in study sizes. Such small sample sizes severely limit the generalisability of findings and raise significant concerns about the reliability and applicability of the results to a broader context.

    A notable issue highlighted in the review is the absence of standardised outcome measures across studies. The outcomes investigated varied considerably, encompassing skin hydration, fine lines, pigmentation, skin elasticity, and scar improvement. This lack of uniformity complicates attempts to synthesise data or perform comparative analyses across different studies. The absence of standardised outcome measures hinders the construction of a coherent narrative on the efficacy of polynucleotides, making it challenging to draw comprehensive conclusions from the existing literature.

    Moreover, the review pointed out that much of the available data is qualitative and lacks the quantifiable metrics necessary for drawing clear, objective conclusions. While many studies suggest that polynucleotides trigger beneficial inflammatory responses, the precise biostimulatory capabilities of these treatments remain poorly elucidated. As noted in Fisher et al (2024), there is a pressing need for more controlled studies to better understand these mechanisms.

    Nevertheless, across all reviewed studies, no significant adverse effects were reported from the treatment protocols, underscoring the outstanding safety profile of this innovative approach (Cavallini et al, 2021). This distinct attribute differentiates it from other conventional aesthetic treatments that achieve comparable outcomes but often carry a higher risk of side effects. This favourable safety record not only enhances the appeal of polynucleotide therapies within the realm of aesthetic medicine but also reinforces their potential as a preferable alternative for patients seeking minimally invasive options to treat skin ageing and preventative ageing.

    The author of the review emphasised the necessity for future research in aesthetic medicine, particularly non-surgical interventions involving polynucleotides, to adopt more rigorous methodologies. This includes implementing larger, more diverse participant groups, employing standardised protocols for measuring outcomes, and extending follow-up periods to assess long-term effects. Such advancements are crucial for the field to progress and for the integration of polynucleotide therapies into clinical practice to be based on solid scientific evidence.

    While the field of polynucleotides in aesthetic medicine holds considerable potential, it is currently limited by significant research shortcomings. The study concludes that there is a compelling need for future investigations to utilise more robust study designs and standardised measurement tools to advance understanding and clinical application of polynucleotide therapies effectively.

    4.7. Recommendations

    Based on a comprehensive literature review on the efficacy of polynucleotides in skin rejuvenation and the examination of the regulatory status and guidelines around polynucleotides, several recommendations can be made to enhance the practical application, research, regulatory oversight, and clinical outcomes associated with these treatments:

    Recommendations for clinical practice:

  • Standardisation of treatment protocols: develop and implement standardised treatment protocols that include dosages, techniques, and treatment intervals for polynucleotide injections. This would help ensure consistent outcomes and improve safety across different practitioners and settings (Smith et al, 2018).
  • Enhanced training and certification: establish rigorous training programmes and certification requirements for practitioners who wish to offer polynucleotide treatments. This would help maintain high standards of care and patient safety (Johnson and Kumar, 2021).
  • Patient selection and personalisation: improve patient selection criteria and customise treatment plans based on individual patient needs, skin types, and expected outcomes. This personalised approach can optimise the efficacy of polynucleotide treatments and enhance patient satisfaction (Lee et al, 2020).
  • Recommendations for research:

  • Long-term efficacy and safety studies: conduct long-term studies to assess the efficacy and safety of polynucleotide treatments over extended periods. This would provide more comprehensive data on the durability of treatment effects and long-term safety (Chen et al, 2022).
  • Comparative studies with other treatments: undertake comparative studies of polynucleotides with other rejuvenation treatments such as hyaluronic acid and botulinum toxin. Such studies could help position polynucleotides within the broader landscape of aesthetic treatments (Martinez et al, 2019).
  • Mechanistic studies: invest in research to fully understand the mechanisms by which polynucleotides aid skin rejuvenation. Understanding the biochemical pathways involved can lead to better targeting and enhancements in treatment formulations (Rho et al, 2023).
  • Recommendations for regulation:

  • Establishment of specific guidelines: advocate for the creation of specific regulatory guidelines for polynucleotide treatments. These guidelines should address all aspects of treatment, including the manufacturing process, quality control, practitioner qualifications, and advertising standards (Davis and Lee, 2020)
  • Post-market surveillance: implement robust post-market surveillance systems to monitor the real-world safety and effectiveness of polynucleotide products. This would help in early identification of potential issues and ensure timely regulatory or clinical responses (Fisher et al, 2024).
  • International collaboration: encourage international collaboration to harmonise regulations and share best practices regarding polynucleotide treatments. This can facilitate broader acceptance and standardisation of these treatments globally (Kim et al, 2021).
  • Recommendations for policy development:

  • Patient education programs: develop and support comprehensive patient education programs to inform potential patients about the benefits, risks, and realistic expectations of polynucleotide treatments (Heidemann and Kutz, 2010).
  • Ethical marketing practices: promote ethical marketing practices among manufacturers and practitioners to ensure that promotional materials accurately represent the scientific evidence and do not make unsubstantiated claims (Larrabee et al, 2004).
  • Accessibility and inclusivity: consider policies that can make these treatments more accessible and affordable, ensuring a broader range of patients can benefit from the latest advancements in aesthetic medicine (Pessa and Rohrich, 2012).
  • These recommendations aim to support the integration of polynucleotide treatments into clinical practice safely and effectively while ensuring robust scientific backing and regulatory oversight. By addressing these key areas, the field of aesthetic medicine can continue to advance in a manner that prioritises patient outcomes and safety.

    Chapter 5: conclusion

    In this comprehensive literature review, we have evaluated the efficacy of polynucleotides in skin rejuvenation alongside the regulatory status and guidelines governing their use within aesthetic medicine. Polynucleotide treatments have shown promising potential in improving skin hydration, elasticity, and overall dermal health due to their influence on cellular repair and collagen production (Lee et al, 2020). These findings suggest a significant capability for polynucleotides to mitigate the effects of ageing, such as fine lines and wrinkles, thereby enhancing skin appearance and texture.

    Despite these benefits, the regulatory framework for Polynucleotide remains underdeveloped, which may hinder their broader adoption and standardisation in clinical practice. The existing literature reveals stark variations in study designs and a prevalence of small sample sizes, which limits the generalisability of results and underscores the need for further large-scale, rigorous studies (Gomez et al, 2019). This gap in research highlights the emerging nature of polynucleotide treatments within the field and points to the necessity for a more structured research agenda to establish robust, evidence-based practices.

    Moreover, the efficacy of polynucleotide, while notable, necessitates a cautious interpretation due to the nascent stage of most studies. Current research has begun to explore the mechanisms underlying their rejuvenating effects, yet more detailed studies are needed to fully understand and optimise these complex biological processes (Smith and Zhao, 2018). Furthermore, the clinical outcomes associated with polynucleotide treatments must be evaluated over longer periods to fully ascertain their long-term safety and effectiveness (Chen et al, 2022).

    Reflecting on the regulatory landscape, there is a pressing need for specific guidelines that address the use of Polynucleotide in aesthetic medicine. Such guidelines would ensure patient safety and uphold high standards of treatment efficacy. The United Kingdom, in particular, could benefit from examining established protocols in countries like South Korea, where polynucleotide treatments have gained significant traction and are supported by a more definitive regulatory framework (Kim et al, 2021).

    In conclusion, while the initial findings regarding Polynucleotide are promising, the aesthetic medicine community must push for more comprehensive studies and a clearer regulatory approach. This will help substantiate the safety profile of polynucleotides and define standardised treatment protocols, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes in skin rejuvenation therapies. Through a concerted effort in research, regulation, and practice, polynucleotide can potentially become a cornerstone treatment option in the ever-evolving field of aesthetic medicine.

    Key points

  • Efficacy of polynucleotides in skin rejuvenation: polynucleotides have been shown to enhance skin hydration, elasticity, and overall dermal health. Their mechanisms of action include cellular repair, anti-inflammatory effects, and stimulation of collagen synthesis. Clinical studies support their efficacy in improving skin texture and integrity, positioning them as a promising non-invasive option for managing skin ageing.
  • Regulatory gaps in the UK: despite their growing adoption in aesthetic medicine, polynucleotides lack comprehensive regulatory oversight in the UK. The absence of standardised guidelines raises concerns regarding product quality, safety, and clinical governance. This review highlights the need for evidence-based regulatory frameworks that align with international best practices to ensure safe and effective application.
  • Call for further research: robust, large-scale randomised controlled trials are necessary to establish the long-term safety and efficacy of polynucleotide treatments. Further mechanistic studies are also required to refine treatment protocols, optimise dosing strategies, and clarify their full therapeutic potential.
  • Clinical implications: polynucleotides offer a regenerative, non-surgical approach to skin rejuvenation, expanding the therapeutic options available in aesthetic medicine. However, their safe and effective integration into practice relies on well-defined clinical protocols, practitioner training, and patient selection criteria to maximise treatment outcomes.
  • Future directions: the development of robust clinical guidelines is essential for standardising the use of polynucleotides in aesthetic practice. Their integration into treatment protocols should be guided by evidence-based patient selection criteria. Establishing these standards will ensure both innovation and patient safety, setting a new benchmark in aesthetic medicine.
  • CPD reflective questions

  • How do polynucleotides promote skin rejuvenation at a cellular level?
  • What clinical indications make a patient suitable for polynucleotide therapy?
  • How can clinicians ensure patient safety when incorporating polynucleotides into practice in the absence of clear guidelines?
  • How do polynucleotide treatments compare with other injectable skin boosters such as hyaluronic acid-based treatments?
  • In what clinical scenarios might polynucleotides be preferred over other bio stimulatory injectables?